Research
Clinical research studies measuring and comparing the effects of EvaSlim's microcurrent treatment for body modification including inch reduction, fat reduction and muscle building.
- Results up to 5 times faster than gym exercise.
- Up to 4 times the rate of inches lost compared to gym exercise in half the time.
- Up to 4 times the fat loss of conventional gym exercise.
- Up to 70% more muscle building than weight training
- Over twice the inch loss of body wraps in less time with continual and lasting results.
- Cumulative and lasting and results.
Abstract (March 2004)
Subjects: Twenty subjects were randomly assigned to the microcurrent group (experimental group four men and six women) and the gym group (control group four men and six women). The age of the subjects ranged from 35 to 49 years old. The mean waist circumference of the men was 52 inches, legs 37 inches, arms 21 inches. The mean waist circumference of the women was 37 inches, legs 26 inches, arms 15 inches
Method: The subjects in the microcurrent group received ten microcurrent sessions on the abdomen, legs and arms. Procedures were offered every other day. Overall treatment was completed within 20 days. The subjects in the gym group went ten times to the gym, every other day, working out for two hours at a time. All subjects were instructed to follow a low fat low carb diet provided by the experimenter and drink at least eight glasses or water daily. All subjects reported compliance with the above instructions.
Measure: Inch Loss.
Results: Statistical analysis (t test) revealed significantly more inch loss - an average of 11.8 inches lost - in the microcurrent group when compared to the gym group with an average of 3.1 inches lost. p< 0.001
Abstract (July 2006)
Retrospective Study: Study of data collected from 400 randomly selected EvaSlim clients.
A random sample of 400 EvaSlim clients treating the mid-section showed an average of 1.02 inches lost on each session with measurements combined for the upper and lower abdomen.
Abstract (December 2004)
Experimental Research: Experimental study comparing the effects of microcurrent on Visceral Fat with two groups of subjects: Microcurrent Experimental Group and Physical Exercise Control Group.
Subjects: Eight subjects were randomly selected and assigned to the microcurrent group (experimental group four women) and the gym group (control group four women). The age of the subjects ranged from 49 to 62 years old. All women were menopausal and had a waist circumference of greater than 35 inches ( 37- 43 inches). Waist circumference has been shown to correlate very closely with the amount of visceral fat that surrounds vital organs.
Method: The subjects in the microcurrent group received ten sessions on the abdomen. Procedures were offered every other day. Overall treatment was completed within 20 days. The subjects in the gym group went ten times to the gym, every other day, working out for two hours at a time. All subjects were instructed to follow a low fat low carb diet provided by the experimenter and drink at least eight glasses of water daily. All subjects reported compliance with the above instructions.
Measure: Inch Loss.
Results: Statistical analysis (t test) revealed significantly more inch loss - an average of 9.9 inches lost - in the microcurrent group when compared to the gym group with an average of 2.4 inches lost. p<0.001
Abstract (September 2004)
Experimental Research: Experimental study comparing the effects of microcurrent on Muscle Building with two patient samples: microcurrent Experimental Group and Physical Exercise Control Group.
Subjects: Nine subjects were randomly assigned to the microcurrent group (four men) and the gym group (five men). The age of the subjects ranged from 29 to 38 years old. All men were athletic and had previously followed a gym regimen.
Method: The subjects in the microcurrent group received ten microcurrent procedures on the legs and arms. Procedures were offered every other day. Overall treatment was completed within 20 days. The subjects in the gym group went ten times to the gym, every other day, lifting weights for four hours on each day and working primarily on their legs and arms. All subjects were instructed to follow a low fat, high protein diet provided by the experimenter. None of the subjects were on steroids. All subjects reported compliance with the above instructions.
Measure: Muscle building measured in inches
Results: Statistical analysis (t test) revealed significantly more muscle building - an average of 3.6 inches of muscle gain- in the microcurrent group when compared to the gym group with an average of 2.1 inches of muscle gain. p<0.01
Abstract (2004)
Experimental Research: Experimental study comparing the effects of microcurrent on inch loss with two groups of subjects: Microcurrent Experimental Group and Body Wrap Control Group.
The microcurrent process used at EvaSlim was compared in a clinical study with body wraps. In 12 sessions the microcurrent 17-minute process gave nearly twice the inch loss of a series of hour-long body wraps - in a just over a quarter of the time. Under 3 1/2 hours was spent on microcurrent compared to 12 hours of body wraps.
Notice that initially the wrap pulls a lot of water out. So pulling out all that water shows a little more inch loss right at first. However, those inches are quickly put back on. Now the wraps really never seem to surpass their initial results as time goes by. It seems there is only so much water you can pull out of your body.
Contrast this with the EvaSlim results which continue to climb the longer you do it. Like regular exercise, results often start to climb rapidly after you've done a number of sessions.
